행동 강령
더 샌드박스 DAO
일반 행동 강령
모든 상호작용에서 더 샌드박스 DAO의 모든 멤버는 다음을 준수합니다.
- 더 샌드박스 DAO 이용 약관에 동의하고 이를 준수합니다.
- 다른 커뮤니티 구성원을 존중하며 모든 형태의 차별이나 혐오 발언에 대해 무관용 정책을 적용합니다.
위원회 행동 강령
더 샌드박스 DAO 특별 위원회의 각 구성원은 다음과 같습니다.
- 청렴하고 공정하며 DAO의 가치와 목표에 헌신하여 더 샌드박스 DAO에 기여할 것을 약속합니다.
- DAO의 평판이나 기능을 해칠 수 있는 행동이나 결정을 피하고 최고의 윤리 기준을 준수합니다.
- 일반 커뮤니티 행동 강령을 준수합니다.
- 커뮤니티에 SIP 추천 여부를 투표하기 전에 SIP 또는 그와 관련된 이해관계가 있을 수 있는 모든 사항을 공개해야 합니다.
- 필요한 경우 기밀을 유지하며 더 샌드박스 DAO의 개인정보 보호 및 보안을 존중합니다.
- 특별위원회 구성원 간에 분쟁이나 이견이 있는 경우, 열린 대화와 공감대 형성을 통해 해결을 위해 노력합니다.
- DAO 커뮤니티와 활발하고 투명한 소통을 유지합니다.
Delegates code of conduct
The Sandbox DAO values the principles of transparency, accountability, and integrity in its governance processes. To ensure that delegates act in the best interest of the community and the ecosystem, we establish this Delegate Code of Conduct. By opting into this code, delegates commit to upholding the highest standards of behaviour and responsibility.
1. Commitment to the Network's Best Interest
- Primary Responsibility: Delegates must prioritise the long-term success and development of The Sandbox ecosystem. Decisions should reflect the broader community's interests, aiming to enhance the sustainability, security, and growth of the platform.
- Good Faith: All actions and votes should be carried out with honesty, integrity, and a transparent commitment to what is believed to be in the best interest of The Sandbox.
- Avoidance of Excessive Delegation: Delegates are discouraged from encouraging excessive voting power delegation to avoid undue influence or manipulation of governance processes.
2. Active Participation in Governance
- Voting Obligations: Delegates are expected to participate actively in the governance process by voting on all proposals and interacting with the community on the dedicated SIPs threads. This ensures that the voting power entrusted to them is used effectively.
- Diligent Review: Prior to voting, delegates must conduct a thorough, selfless, and unbiased review of each proposal, ensuring decisions are made with full understanding of the potential impacts.
- Engagement in Debate: Delegates should engage constructively in discussions surrounding governance proposals, expressing well-reasoned support or opposition. In cases of conflict of interest or insufficient information, delegates are encouraged to abstain rather than recuse themselves.
3. Transparency and Communication
- Rationale for Votes: Delegates must communicate the reasoning behind their voting decisions to the community and their delegators. This transparency helps build trust and allows delegators to understand the delegates' perspectives.
- Availability: Delegates should be reasonably accessible to the community to answer questions, respond to comments, and discuss issues regarding proposals.
- Notification of Termination: Delegates intending to step down from their role must notify the community at least one month in advance, allowing sufficient time for delegators to choose alternative representation.
4. Civility and Professionalism
- Respectful Conduct: Delegates must foster a safe, welcoming, and harassment-free environment for all participants in the governance process. This includes respecting differing viewpoints and engaging in civil discourse.
- Prohibited Behaviours: Unacceptable behaviours, such as harassment, bullying, and aggressive conduct, as outlined in the Code of Conduct, are not tolerated.
- Constructive Feedback: Delegates should provide feedback that is well-researched, supported by evidence, and devoid of personal attacks. All arguments should focus on the merits of the proposals and the best interest of The Sandbox.
5. Conflict of Interest
- SIP Authorship and Relationships: Delegate forfeit their ability to propose a SIP.
- Disclosure of Conflicts: Delegates must avoid conflicts of interest, and declare if someone with a close personal or professional relationship, is the author of a SIP or stands to gain personal benefit from their voting actions. Any actual or potential conflicts must be disclosed to the community promptly. Delegates are required to not vote on any proposal where a conflict of interest exists.
- Transparency in Conflicts: Even potential conflicts should be disclosed, ensuring that all governance activities are conducted without bias or personal gain influencing decisions. Delegates are also required to not vote on any proposal where a potential conflict of interest exists.
6. Anti-Lobbying and Influence Protections
- Lobbying Disclosure: To protect the integrity of the decision-making process, delegates must disclose any lobbying efforts directed towards them that could influence their voting decisions. This includes any form of communication or pressure from external parties.
- Abstention in Cases of Influence: If a delegate feels that lobbying or undue influence has compromised their impartiality, they are required to abstain from voting on the relevant proposal.
- Transparency in Communications: All communications that may influence a delegate’s vote should be logged and disclosed to the community. This ensures full transparency and reduces the risk of hidden lobbying efforts.
7. Adherence to the Spirit of the Code
- Integrity Beyond Rules: While this Code of Conduct may not cover all possible scenarios, delegates are expected to adhere to its spirit. They should refrain from exploiting any potential loopholes, acting in good faith and in the best interest of the community at all times.
8. Optional Participation and Accountability
- Opt-In Commitment: Delegates may choose to opt into this Code of Conduct by indicating their agreement in the application form. By doing so, they signal their commitment to uphold these standards.
- Ongoing Feedback: The community is invited to provide feedback on this Code of Conduct. Strongly-held views and constructive suggestions will be considered for incorporation into future versions of the document, ensuring it remains robust and fair.
- Penalties for Non-Compliance: Delegates who fail to adhere to this Code of Conduct, particularly regarding conflict of interest disclosures, may face penalties, including the loss of delegate status and the SIP being cancelled.